Mr. Maurer has obviously thought - and came to the conclusion to hand over " dangerous" people no military weapons anymore, or not, hand out already, but do not give more back home. Now, one could observe the fact that SVP politician, if you take a real interest with a matter that quickly come to the same conclusions as their political opponents (eg, Marcel Giant the issue of juvenile justice , although as the reason all the political parties lost something, or the proposed reduction of the army, which runs out eventually come to an end of conscription ). seems symptomatic to me but other aspects to be:
- The reasons for the Polti's rights, why the guns must be given to take home is this:
Switzerland is a free republic. Expression of our freedom is the tradition of the militia army. The armed citizen soldier was in Greece expression of the great trust that the state brings against its citizens. [Source: Roger Köppel, World Week ]
- This confidence of the state in its citizens is obviously limited: Dangerous citizens trust the state, but only approximately. Dangerous means but "not in this kind of thinking still dangerous," because the danger of a man seen even in that he has committed a crime (or has not paid an invoice - for Maurer would also consult the operation of extracts from the register to the dangerousness of a person to close).
- The whole action is another step in delusion, our society would have to avoid risks by hazardous elements (And one man says with elements) locked up, deprived of their rights to be identified and marked (possibly in different order).
- And ultimately it shows that the real problem is not yet understood, we need no weapons. Nobody needs a gun. Neither at home, or anywhere else. Who wants to shoot for his pleasure, may do so at the one Vergnüngsstand.
- Well, I probably missed an important function:
0 comments:
Post a Comment