Wordpress Samantha Anderson

Heading - Pearls of advertising

advertising - so maybe a little shorter train of thought - is either product, so a service to consumers, or expression of an effort to persuade consumers to buy a product that he had not bought at that price, if it were not for advertising - that information or manipulation. Today I have three forms advertising meets that look very tempting but: there
This great show is now in the Hallenstadion. A press text:

Ben Hur survives the galleys only by his desire for revenge and love with the beautiful Esther. In the legendary chariot race, he defeated his rival and former friend the Roman Messala. The encounter with Jesus finally convinced Ben Hur by the Christian message of peace, and he turns away from his violent revenge plans.

The show will display the revenge Ben Hur excessively, only to announce at the end the love message of Jesus (at least in the states, the billboard). If this message arrived, there It probably few people who would get off on the presentation of gladiatorial combat. But good: The message declaration was 2000 years ago, maybe a good thing that someone is doing it again.
Aldi and Lidl to force producers and even their employees time and again, apart from their monotonous work miserable conditions, yet do so, as they found the operation a life enrichment and were quite happy to work there. The consumer is suggested at the same time, it was some kind of achievement that there are now 100 branches of Aldi in Switzerland. On one of these posters has managed a staff member to deny the omnipotence of their employer: Sent the lady ducks behind the nice waving Lord.
» The riddle does not exist ...," wrote Wittgenstein. And obviously he was wrong: there is it anyway. Well, we see a sympathetic master, not without skill in the kitchen, he uses vinegar for salad dressing, cooking Rahmschnitzel with Swiss cream, and even used some vegetables, though mayonnaise, but still, he cooks, and try as he barely perceptible looks into the camera. He is a mistake: he has confused sugar and salt. The information from the title. And now the question of what conclusion we should draw an attentive viewer of this poster? Klar - dieser Mann geht, weil er schon Salz und Zucker verwechselt hat, auch noch gleich Blutspenden. Oder: Irgendwie hat er ein Problem, welches ihn daran hindert, Salz und Zucker zu unterscheiden, aber das Problem hindert ihn nicht daran (»doch«), Blut zu spenden. Oder übersehe ich etwas?
(On a more serious note: Blutspenden wäre wirklich gut, es fehlt an Konserven und mit solchen Kampagnen kann das Problem wohl nicht gelöst werden. Auch nicht damit, dass man Schwule daran hindert , Blut zu spenden.)